Naming and Labelling
A disability label can
have several effects: Disability labels affect how people are towards disabled
people because of how disabled people may present themselves without meaning to.
For example, someone having a speech problem.
× Dyslexia causes reading, writing and spelling
difficulties.
× Most people think people
with Dyslexia cannot read, write and spell at all.
× Dyslexia also affects people’s
memory and how they understand things.
× They may not remember what
they have read, what happened in a program they may have watched on TV, or what
someone may have said.
Area What it can influence
Perception How other people understand the person's
abilities and needs
Value Whether the person is treated with dignity and
respect
Relationships How family, teachers, employers, professionals,
and peers interact with them
Expectations: What others believe the person can or cannot
accomplish
Opportunities: Whether someone is included or excluded from
education, employment, activities, and community life
⚠️ Some words used to describe people with disabilities are
disliked or rejected because they can be dehumanising, insulting, outdated, or
associated with discrimination and bullying.
Examples include:
Handicap
Cripple
“Mentally retarded” — now
widely considered outdated and offensive when referring to people with
intellectual disabilities.
The problem is not simply
the individual word. The way a word is used and the attitudes behind it also
matter.
People with disabilities
may feel negative labels:
Make them feel less human
or less valued.
Cause other people to
focus on their difficulties rather than their strengths.
Create assumptions about
what they can or cannot do.
Make them feel that other
people see the diagnosis or disability before seeing the person.
Reinforce stigma,
discrimination, and bullying.
Strengths and difficulties
An important point is that
everyone has both strengths and difficulties, although these are different for
every person.
Having a disability does
not mean that someone has no strengths. A person may need significant support
in one area while having considerable strengths in another.
For example:
A person might have
difficulty with reading but be very good at explaining ideas verbally.
or:
A person might need
physical assistance but have excellent knowledge, creativity, humour, or
problem-solving skills.
Therefore, professionals
should use a strengths-based approach rather than seeing someone only in terms
of their difficulties.
🧑🤝🧑 The connection with
bullying
Negative labels can also
contribute to bullying. When society repeatedly uses disability-related words
as insults or jokes, it can reinforce the idea that disability is something
inferior or shameful.
This can affect people:
language → attitudes → expectations → behavior → inclusion
The reasons can be very
varied. A child might be targeted because they are perceived as:
Poor or wealthy compared
with other children.
More or less academically
able than their peers.
Different in appearance,
interests, personality, communication, or behaviours.
From a particular family
or social background.
Experiencing difficulties
at home, although this should never be assumed to be the reason someone bullies
another person.
It's also important to
avoid suggesting that everyone who experiences these circumstances will become
a bully or a victim of bullying. Children respond to difficult family
circumstances, poverty, conflict, abuse, or social differences in very
different ways.
Connecting this to
disability
For disability, the same
principle applies. A child may be bullied because other children perceive them
as different, perhaps because of a disability, communication style, physical
appearance, learning difficulty, or need for additional support.
But the responsibility
belongs with bullying behaviours, not with the different child.
This fits nicely with your
section on labelling:
When people attach
negative labels and stereotypes to someone, those labels can influence how
others treat that person.
And that's why respectful
language and inclusive attitudes matter from childhood onward. They can help
children learn that having differences does not make someone less valuable,
less capable, or less deserving of respect.
So the goal of respectful
disability language isn't just to find a "nicer word." It is about
recognising the person's humanity, strengths, rights, and individuality rather
than reducing them to a label.
The problem isn't
necessarily having a diagnostic label. A diagnosis can be extremely useful.
The problem occurs when
people reduce the person to the label.
For example:
"She has dyslexia and
needs accessible reading materials."
Recognises a particular
support need.
But:
"She's dyslexic, so
she won't be able to do this."
turns the label into an
assumption about the person's abilities.
That's an important
distinction because a diagnosis does not tell us everything about an
individual. Two people with the same diagnosis can have very different
strengths, difficulties, communication styles, support needs, and life
experiences.
👤 Person vs. label
A useful principle for
this module is:
The person comes first in
terms of their humanity; the diagnostic label describes one aspect of their
life.
This also connects
directly with the social model of disability. If society attaches stereotypes
and negative expectations to a label, those attitudes can themselves become
disabling barriers.
And person-first versus
identity-first language is a little more complicated than simply saying one is
"right" and the other is "wrong." Individual preference
matters, and different disability communities have developed different preferences
around language.